Adobe vs Datadog stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Datadog grows faster.
Side by side
| Adobe | Datadog | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $66.5 billion | |
| 30.0% | 3.1% | |
| +13.1% | +41.5% | |
| 13.3× | 617.1× | |
| 0.1 years | 4.5 years | |
| 39.9% | 2.2% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Fortinet · Adobe vs Corning · Adobe vs IBM · Adobe vs Intel · Datadog vs Applied Materials · Datadog vs Arista Networks · Datadog vs Broadcom · Datadog vs Cadence Design Systems

