Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Intuit?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Intuit?

Intuit grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Intuit?

Intuit costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Intuit?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

IntuitINTU

Applied Materials vs Intuit stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable and has less debt. Intuit grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Intuit
	$294 billion	$91.3 billion
	24.7%	21.3%
	+10.5%	+17.4%
	42.0×	20.0×
	Net cash	0.6 years
	28.1%	15.6%
	0.4%	1.4%

Open Applied Materials Open Intuit

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs KLA · Applied Materials vs Lumentum Holdings · Applied Materials vs Lam Research · Applied Materials vs Monolithic Power Systems · Intuit vs AMD · Intuit vs Arista Networks · Intuit vs ASML · Intuit vs Broadcom