Which is better, AMAT or NVDA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) currently grades higher than AMAT — 72/100 (C grade) vs 76/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AMAT wins on Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch; NVDA wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AMAT or NVDA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AMAT and NVDA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AMAT better than NVDA for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (76/100 vs 72/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between AMAT and NVDA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AMAT currently scores 76/100 (B grade); NVDA scores 72/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AMAT or NVDA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AMAT and NVDA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AMAT or NVDA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AMAT and NVDA both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AMAT vs NVDA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Applied Materials

Nvidia

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

AMAT

Applied Materials

Market cap

$339.16B

Sector

Technology

NVDA

Nvidia

Market cap

$5.32T

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

Nvidia NVDA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	AMAT	NVDA	Winner
Warren Buffett	76B	72C	AMAT
Benjamin Graham	87A	89A	NVDA
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AMAT	NVDA
Market cap	$339.16B	$5.32T
P/E (TTM)	40.0x	45.6x
EV/EBIT	41.0x	42.0x
ROIC (TTM)	21.6%	62.88%
Gross margin	48.96%	71.07%
Net margin	29.31%	55.6%
Revenue CAGR 5y	5.31%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AMAT leads on

Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.02%+96%
P/E (TTM)40.0xvs 45.6x+12%

NVDA leads on

Market cap$5.32Tvs $339.16B+94%

More like AMAT

AMAT vs LRCX AMAT vs ADBE AMAT vs KARO AMAT vs ANET AMAT vs ATEN AMAT vs KLAC

More like NVDA

NVDA vs LRCX

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.