Amgen vs Gilead Sciences stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Amgen grows faster. Gilead Sciences is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Amgen | Gilead Sciences | |
|---|---|---|
| $252 billion | $208 billion | |
| 21.0% | 28.9% | |
| +7.6% | +3.6% | |
| 32.7× | 24.5× | |
| 2.7 years | 1.3 years | |
| 15.0% | 18.4% | |
| 2.9% | 2.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Amgen vs Intuitive Surgical · Amgen vs Johnson & Johnson · Amgen vs Eli Lilly · Amgen vs Medtronic · Gilead Sciences vs Johnson & Johnson · Gilead Sciences vs Eli Lilly · Gilead Sciences vs Merck & · Gilead Sciences vs Roche

