Brookfield Asset Management vs Mastercard stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Brookfield Asset Management is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Mastercard grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Brookfield Asset Management | Mastercard | |
|---|---|---|
| $82.3 billion | $576 billion | |
| 53.9% | 45.6% | |
| +11.4% | +16.5% | |
| 33.1× | 38.5× | |
| 0.6 years | 0.4 years | |
| 22.0% | 58.5% | |
| 3.8% | 0.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Brookfield Asset Management vs Moody's · Brookfield Asset Management vs S&P Global · Brookfield Asset Management vs Visa · Brookfield Asset Management vs Blackstone · Mastercard vs Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria · Mastercard vs Barclays · Mastercard vs Bank of New York Mellon · Mastercard vs BlackRock

