Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Novo Nordisk stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Novo Nordisk is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | Novo Nordisk | |
|---|---|---|
| $130 billion | $184 billion | |
| 14.6% | 33.1% | |
| +2.5% | +20.4% | |
| 18.4× | 12.2× | |
| 2.4 years | 0.7 years | |
| 13.9% | 33.6% | |
| 4.4% | 4.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Roche · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Thermo Fisher Scientific · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs UnitedHealth · Bristol-Myers Squibb vs AbbVie · Novo Nordisk vs Johnson & Johnson · Novo Nordisk vs Eli Lilly · Novo Nordisk vs Medtronic · Novo Nordisk vs Roche

