Brookfield vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
S&P Global is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Brookfield | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $91.5 billion | $137 billion | |
| 1.7% | 29.2% | |
| −6.8% | +15.6% | |
| 70.0× | 30.7× | |
| 7.6 years | 1.5 years | |
| 5.7% | 11.8% | |
| 0.5% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Brookfield vs Visa · Brookfield vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Brookfield vs JPMorgan Chase · Brookfield vs Mastercard · S&P Global vs The Bank of Nova Scotia · S&P Global vs Blackstone · S&P Global vs Citigroup · S&P Global vs Chubb

