Blackstone vs Visa stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Blackstone grows faster. Visa is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Blackstone | Visa | |
|---|---|---|
| $148 billion | $794 billion | |
| 24.3% | 51.2% | |
| +20.3% | +13.7% | |
| 49.1× | 33.8× | |
| 1.6 years | 0.3 years | |
| 20.4% | 31.8% | |
| 4.3% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Blackstone vs Brookfield Asset Management · Blackstone vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Blackstone vs JPMorgan Chase · Blackstone vs KKR & · Visa vs Citigroup · Visa vs CaixaBank · Visa vs Chubb · Visa vs Commonwealth Bank of Australia

