Which is better, CB or FNDF?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) currently grades higher than CB — 50/100 (C grade) vs 54/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CB wins on Warren Buffett and Terry Smith; FNDF wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, and Charlie Munger. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CB or FNDF?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CB and FNDF are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CB better than FNDF for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (54/100 vs 50/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between CB and FNDF on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CB currently scores 54/100 (C grade); FNDF scores 50/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CB or FNDF?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CB and FNDF are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CB or FNDF?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CB and FNDF both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Chubb Limited (CB) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CB vs FNDF comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Chubb Limited

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Chubb Limited

Market cap

$125.72B

Sector

Financials

FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

Market cap

$22.96B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF FNDF

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CB	FNDF	Winner
Warren Buffett	54C	50C	CB
Benjamin Graham	39D	50C	FNDF
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CB	FNDF
Market cap	$125.72B	$22.96B
P/E (TTM)	11.3x	-
EV/EBIT	10.8x	-
ROIC (TTM)	32.47%	-
Gross margin	35.2%	-
Net margin	18.48%	-
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.04%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CB leads on

Market cap$125.72Bvs $22.96B+82%

FNDF leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

More like CB

CB vs MSCI CB vs V CB vs MA CB vs PLMR CB vs TW CB vs MKTX

More like FNDF

FNDF vs MSCI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.