Commonwealth Bank of Australia vs JPMorgan Chase stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more profitable. JPMorgan Chase grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | JPMorgan Chase | |
|---|---|---|
| A$286 billion | $919 billion | |
| 35.3% | 31.4% | |
| +6.5% | +8.7% | |
| 28.2× | 16.1× | |
| – | 11.3 years | |
| – | 3.0% | |
| 2.8% | 2.0% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Commonwealth Bank of Australia vs Visa · Commonwealth Bank of Australia vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · JPMorgan Chase vs Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce · JPMorgan Chase vs CME Group · JPMorgan Chase vs Capital One Financial · JPMorgan Chase vs UniCredit

