Which is better, CBOE or OXLCI?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) currently grades higher than OXLCI — 67/100 (C grade) vs 31/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CBOE wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; OXLCI wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CBOE or OXLCI?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CBOE and OXLCI are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CBOE better than OXLCI for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CBOE currently grades higher — 67/100 vs 31/100, a 36-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CBOE and OXLCI on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CBOE currently scores 67/100 (C grade); OXLCI scores 31/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CBOE or OXLCI?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CBOE and OXLCI are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CBOE or OXLCI?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CBOE and OXLCI both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CBOE vs OXLCI comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Cboe Global Markets

Oxford Lane Capital

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CBOE

Cboe Global Markets

Market cap

$37.99B

Sector

Financials

OXLCI

Oxford Lane Capital

Market cap

$12.4B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Cboe Global Markets CBOE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CBOE	OXLCI	Winner
Warren Buffett	67C	31F	CBOE
Benjamin Graham	84A	14F	CBOE
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CBOE	OXLCI
Market cap	$37.99B	$12.4B
P/E (TTM)	30.8x	597.3x
EV/EBIT	24.7x	19.2x
ROIC (TTM)	10.59%	7.99%
Gross margin	52.22%	70.64%
Net margin	25.77%	0.84%
Revenue CAGR 5y	7.77%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CBOE leads on

EPS CAGR 5y20.69%vs -35.9%+158%
Net margin25.77%vs 0.84%+97%
P/E (TTM)30.8xvs 597.3x+95%
Market cap$37.99Bvs $12.4B

More like CBOE

CBOE vs MSCI CBOE vs V CBOE vs MA CBOE vs PLMR CBOE vs TW CBOE vs MKTX

More like OXLCI

OXLCI vs MSCI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.