Which is better, CCZ or CHT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) currently grades higher than CCZ — 58/100 (C grade) vs 42/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CCZ wins on Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; CHT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CCZ or CHT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CCZ and CHT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CCZ better than CHT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CHT currently grades higher — 58/100 vs 42/100, a 16-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CCZ and CHT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CCZ currently scores 42/100 (D grade); CHT scores 58/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CCZ or CHT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CCZ and CHT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CCZ or CHT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CCZ and CHT both Communication Services stocks?

Yes — both Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) and Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) operate in the Communication Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CCZ vs CHT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Comcast

Chunghwa Telecom

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CCZ

Comcast

Market cap

$15.9B

Sector

Communication Services

CHT

Chunghwa Telecom

Market cap

$33.88B

Sector

Communication Services

Overall winner

Chunghwa Telecom CHT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CCZ	CHT	Winner
Warren Buffett	42D	58C	CHT
Benjamin Graham	37D	70B	CHT
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CCZ	CHT
Market cap	$15.9B	$33.88B
P/E (TTM)	4.8x	27.9x
EV/EBIT	8.4x	22.0x
ROIC (TTM)	6.32%	8.58%
Gross margin	61.67%	35.78%
Net margin	14.85%	16.41%
Revenue CAGR 5y	1.54%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CCZ leads on

EPS CAGR 5y15.03%vs 2.0%+87%
P/E (TTM)4.8xvs 27.9x+83%
EV/EBIT8.4xvs 22.0x+62%
Gross margin61.67%vs 35.78%

More like CCZ

CCZ vs MTCH CCZ vs NYT CCZ vs TTD CCZ vs GOOGL CCZ vs GOOG CCZ vs META

More like CHT

CHT vs MTCH

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.