Cadence Design Systems vs Intel stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cadence Design Systems is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Cadence Design Systems | Intel | |
|---|---|---|
| $88.6 billion | $317 billion | |
| 20.9% | -0.5% | |
| +14.6% | −7.5% | |
| 79.9× | No profit yet | |
| Net cash | 2.3 years | |
| 16.4% | 1.3% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cadence Design Systems vs Intuit · Cadence Design Systems vs KLA · Cadence Design Systems vs Lumentum Holdings · Cadence Design Systems vs Lam Research · Intel vs Fortinet · Intel vs Intuit · Intel vs KLA · Intel vs Lam Research

