Which is better, CDNS or TER?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) currently grades higher than TER — 78/100 (B grade) vs 65/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CDNS wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; TER wins on Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CDNS or TER?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CDNS and TER are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CDNS better than TER for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CDNS currently grades higher — 78/100 vs 65/100, a 13-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CDNS and TER on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CDNS currently scores 78/100 (B grade); TER scores 65/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CDNS or TER?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CDNS and TER are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CDNS or TER?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CDNS and TER both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CDNS vs TER comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Cadence Design Systems

Teradyne

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CDNS

Market cap

$103.04B

Sector

Technology

TER

Teradyne

Market cap

$56.11B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

Cadence Design Systems CDNS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CDNS	TER	Winner
Warren Buffett	78B	65B	CDNS
Benjamin Graham	84A	84A	Tie
Philip Fisher	84A	60D	CDNS
Peter Lynch	78B	24F	CDNS
Joel Greenblatt	58C	69C	TER
Charlie Munger	80A	78B	CDNS
Terry Smith	80A	70C	CDNS

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CDNS	TER
Market cap	$103.04B	$56.11B
P/E (TTM)	80.7x	61.9x
EV/EBIT	59.1x	76.0x
ROIC (TTM)	12.19%	25.66%
Gross margin	88.85%	58.79%
Net margin	21.18%	22.55%
Revenue CAGR 5y	15.38%	-3.66%
EPS CAGR 5y	12.65%	-13.21%
Debt / Equity	0.5x	0.0x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.15%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CDNS leads on

EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -13.21%+196%
Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs -3.66%+124%
Market cap$103.04Bvs $56.11B+46%
Gross margin88.85%vs 58.79%+34%

TER leads on

Dividend yield0.15%vs 0.0%+100%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+94%
ROIC (TTM)25.66%vs 12.19%+52%
P/E (TTM)61.9xvs 80.7x+23%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Cadence Design Systems

Teradyne

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CDNS

More like TER

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis