Cadence Design Systems vs Uber stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cadence Design Systems is more profitable and has less debt. Uber grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Cadence Design Systems | Uber | |
|---|---|---|
| $88.6 billion | $142 billion | |
| 20.9% | 19.3% | |
| +14.6% | +36.1% | |
| 79.9× | 14.2× | |
| Net cash | 0.7 years | |
| 16.4% | 12.9% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cadence Design Systems vs Western Digital · Cadence Design Systems vs Apple · Cadence Design Systems vs Accenture · Cadence Design Systems vs Adobe · Uber vs Fortinet · Uber vs Intuit · Uber vs KLA · Uber vs Lam Research

