Which is better, CDNS or UI?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) currently grades higher than CDNS — 74/100 (B grade) vs 78/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CDNS wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch; UI wins on Benjamin Graham, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CDNS or UI?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CDNS and UI are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CDNS better than UI for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (78/100 vs 74/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between CDNS and UI on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CDNS currently scores 78/100 (B grade); UI scores 74/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CDNS or UI?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CDNS and UI are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CDNS or UI?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CDNS and UI both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CDNS vs UI comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Cadence Design Systems

Ubiquiti

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CDNS

Market cap

$103.04B

Sector

Technology

Ubiquiti

Market cap

$36.97B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

Ubiquiti UI

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CDNS	UI	Winner
Warren Buffett	78B	74B	CDNS
Benjamin Graham	84A	89A	UI
Philip Fisher	84A	64C	CDNS
Peter Lynch	78B	63C	CDNS
Joel Greenblatt	58C	91C	UI
Charlie Munger	80A	81A	UI
Terry Smith	80A	81A	UI

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CDNS	UI
Market cap	$103.04B	$36.97B
P/E (TTM)	80.7x	41.5x
EV/EBIT	59.1x	46.3x
ROIC (TTM)	12.19%	71.27%
Gross margin	88.85%	46.02%
Net margin	21.18%	30.43%
Revenue CAGR 5y	15.38%	7.91%
EPS CAGR 5y	12.65%	4.71%
Debt / Equity	0.5x	0.1x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.46%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CDNS leads on

Market cap$103.04Bvs $36.97B+64%
EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs 4.71%+63%
Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 7.91%+49%
Gross margin88.85%vs 46.02%+48%

UI leads on

Dividend yield0.46%vs 0.0%+100%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+88%
ROIC (TTM)71.27%vs 12.19%+83%
P/E (TTM)41.5xvs 80.7x+49%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Cadence Design Systems

Ubiquiti

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CDNS

More like UI

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis