Which is better, CE or CF?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) currently grades higher than CE — 64/100 (C grade) vs 33/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CE wins on none; CF wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CE or CF?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CE and CF are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CE better than CF for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CF currently grades higher — 64/100 vs 33/100, a 31-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CE and CF on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CE currently scores 33/100 (F grade); CF scores 64/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CE or CF?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CE and CF are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CE or CF?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CE and CF both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both Celanese Corporation (CE) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CE vs CF comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Celanese

CF Industries Holdings

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Celanese

Market cap

$5.75B

Sector

Materials

CF Industries Holdings

Market cap

$18.7B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

CF Industries Holdings CF

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CE	CF	Winner
Warren Buffett	33F	64C	CF
Benjamin Graham	41D	72B	CF
Philip Fisher	19F	60C	CF
Peter Lynch	33F	42D	CF
Joel Greenblatt	28F	35D	CF
Charlie Munger	25F	66C	CF
Terry Smith	15F	69B	CF

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CE	CF
Market cap	$5.75B	$18.7B
P/E (TTM)	-	10.9x
EV/EBIT	22.2x	8.8x
ROIC (TTM)	-3.56%	15.41%
Gross margin	19.83%	40.41%
Net margin	-11.54%	23.73%
Revenue CAGR 5y	2.83%	2.03%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	20.46%
Debt / Equity	3.1x	0.7x
Dividend yield	0.21%	1.61%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CE leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 10.9x+152%
Revenue CAGR 5y2.83%vs 2.03%+28%

CF leads on

Net margin23.73%vs -11.54%+149%
ROIC (TTM)15.41%vs -3.56%+123%
Dividend yield1.61%vs 0.21%+87%
Debt / Equity0.7xvs 3.1x+78%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Celanese

CF Industries Holdings

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CE

More like CF

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis