Which is better, CENX or MP?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Century Aluminum Company (CENX) currently grades higher than MP — 32/100 (F grade) vs 27/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CENX wins on Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; MP wins on Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CENX or MP?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CENX and MP are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CENX better than MP for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CENX currently grades higher — 32/100 vs 27/100, a 5-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CENX and MP on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CENX currently scores 32/100 (F grade); MP scores 27/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CENX or MP?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CENX and MP are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CENX or MP?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CENX and MP both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both Century Aluminum Company (CENX) and MP Materials Corp. (MP) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CENX vs MP comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Century Aluminum

MP Materials

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CENX

Century Aluminum

Market cap

$5.62B

Sector

Materials

MP Materials

Market cap

$10.91B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

Century Aluminum CENX

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CENX	MP	Winner
Warren Buffett	32F	27F	CENX
Benjamin Graham	47D	56D	MP
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CENX	MP
Market cap	$5.62B	$10.91B
P/E (TTM)	16.1x	-
EV/EBIT	37.5x	-
ROIC (TTM)	9.46%	-2.58%
Gross margin	12.67%	24.16%
Net margin	13.75%	-20.48%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.39%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CENX leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y3.39%vs -4.56%+174%
Net margin13.75%vs -20.48%+167%
ROIC (TTM)9.46%vs -2.58%+127%

MP leads on

More like CENX

CENX vs GFI CENX vs SCCO CENX vs BHP CENX vs RGLD CENX vs BCPC CENX vs WPM

More like MP

MP vs GFI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.