Which is more profitable, Celestica or Flex?

Celestica keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Celestica or Flex?

Celestica grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Celestica or Flex?

Flex costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Celestica or Flex?

Celestica would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

CelesticaCLSvs

FlexFLEX

Celestica vs Flex stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Celestica is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Flex is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Celestica	Flex
	$30.3 billion	$27.7 billion
	6.7%	3.2%
	+19.6%	+3.0%
	36.4×	31.5×
	0.3 years	1.0 years
	29.2%	11.0%
	–	–

Open Celestica Open Flex

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Celestica vs Jabil · Flex vs Jabil