Comcast vs Warner Bros. Discovery stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Comcast is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Warner Bros. Discovery has less debt.
Side by side
| Comcast | Warner Bros. Discovery | |
|---|---|---|
| $89.3 billion | $77.6 billion | |
| 16.2% | 1.9% | |
| +3.6% | +3.3% | |
| 4.5× | 106.7× | |
| 1.9 years | 1.3 years | |
| 12.5% | 4.4% | |
| 5.3% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Comcast vs AppLovin · Comcast vs Charter Communications · Comcast vs Alphabet · Comcast vs Alphabet · Warner Bros. Discovery vs Alphabet · Warner Bros. Discovery vs Alphabet · Warner Bros. Discovery vs Meta · Warner Bros. Discovery vs Netflix

