Which is more profitable, Canadian Natural Resources or Phillips 66?

Canadian Natural Resources keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Canadian Natural Resources or Phillips 66?

Phillips 66 grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Canadian Natural Resources or Phillips 66?

Canadian Natural Resources costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Canadian Natural Resources or Phillips 66?

Canadian Natural Resources would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Canadian Natural ResourcesCNQvs

Phillips 66PSX

Canadian Natural Resources vs Phillips 66 stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Canadian Natural Resources is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Phillips 66 grows faster.

Side by side

	Canadian Natural Resources	Phillips 66
	$101 billion	$103 billion
	24.5%	3.3%
	−3.7%	+15.6%
	13.4×	23.5×
	0.7 years	1.9 years
	19.0%	10.8%
	3.4%	2.8%

Open Canadian Natural Resources Open Phillips 66

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Canadian Natural Resources vs Targa Resources · Canadian Natural Resources vs TotalEnergies · Canadian Natural Resources vs The Williams Companies · Canadian Natural Resources vs Exxon Mobil · Phillips 66 vs Chevron · Phillips 66 vs Enbridge · Phillips 66 vs EOG Resources · Phillips 66 vs MPLX LP