Which is more profitable, CrowdStrike Holdings or Lam Research?

Lam Research keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, CrowdStrike Holdings or Lam Research?

CrowdStrike Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, CrowdStrike Holdings or Lam Research?

Lam Research costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, CrowdStrike Holdings or Lam Research?

CrowdStrike Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

CrowdStrike HoldingsCRWDvs

Lam ResearchLRCX

CrowdStrike Holdings vs Lam Research stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

CrowdStrike Holdings grows faster and has less debt. Lam Research is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	CrowdStrike Holdings	Lam Research
	$232 billion	$282 billion
	-3.4%	31.3%
	+40.6%	+9.7%
	No profit yet	38.8×
	Net cash	Net cash
	-1.5%	42.1%
	–	0.3%

Open CrowdStrike Holdings Open Lam Research

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: CrowdStrike Holdings vs Microsoft · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Nvidia · CrowdStrike Holdings vs TSMC · CrowdStrike Holdings vs Apple · Lam Research vs Cisco · Lam Research vs Datadog · Lam Research vs Dell Technologies · Lam Research vs Fortinet