Curtiss-Wright vs Eaton stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Curtiss-Wright has less debt. Eaton is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Curtiss-Wright | Eaton | |
|---|---|---|
| $17.1 billion | $137 billion | |
| 13.8% | 14.9% | |
| +7.9% | +9.0% | |
| 35.4× | 33.6× | |
| 1.1 years | 1.6 years | |
| 12.7% | 14.0% | |
| 0.1% | 1.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Eaton vs Fastenal · Eaton vs General Electric · Eaton vs General Dynamics · Eaton vs GE Aerospace

