The Ensign Group vs National HealthCare stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The Ensign Group grows faster. National HealthCare is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| The Ensign Group | National HealthCare | |
|---|---|---|
| $11.0 billion | $3.26 billion | |
| 6.8% | 7.9% | |
| +16.1% | +12.2% | |
| 32.0× | 27.1× | |
| 3.0 years | Net cash | |
| 8.5% | -0.4% | |
| 0.1% | 1.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The Ensign Group vs PACS Group · National HealthCare vs PACS Group