Which is better, FLS or OMAB?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) currently grades higher than FLS — 69/100 (B grade) vs 51/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — FLS wins on Benjamin Graham; OMAB wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FLS or OMAB?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FLS and OMAB are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FLS better than OMAB for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, OMAB currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 51/100, a 18-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between FLS and OMAB on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FLS currently scores 51/100 (C grade); OMAB scores 69/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FLS or OMAB?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FLS and OMAB are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FLS or OMAB?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FLS and OMAB both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FLS vs OMAB comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Flowserve

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

FLS

Flowserve

Market cap

$8.9B

Sector

Industrials

OMAB

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Market cap

$4.98B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. OMAB

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	FLS	OMAB	Winner
Warren Buffett	51C	69B	OMAB
Benjamin Graham	68B	66B	FLS
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FLS	OMAB
Market cap	$8.9B	$4.98B
P/E (TTM)	23.4x	16.2x
EV/EBIT	15.3x	10.7x
ROIC (TTM)	9.31%	10.34%
Gross margin	35.53%	69.04%
Net margin	7.61%	32.63%
Revenue CAGR 5y	7.5%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FLS leads on

Market cap$8.9Bvs $4.98B+44%
EPS CAGR 5y28.68%vs 16.57%+42%
Debt / Equity0.9xvs 1.1x+21%

OMAB leads on

More like FLS

FLS vs CTAS FLS vs FAST FLS vs RELX FLS vs TT FLS vs CSW FLS vs HEI

More like OMAB

OMAB vs CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.