Which is better, FLTR or FNDF?

FLTR and FNDF tie on the headline Buffett-Fit score (50/100 each). The decision comes down to which underlying framework you trust most — FLTR leads on none; FNDF leads on none. The pillar-by-pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FLTR or FNDF?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FLTR and FNDF are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FLTR better than FNDF for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (50/100 vs 50/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between FLTR and FNDF on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FLTR currently scores 50/100 (C grade); FNDF scores 50/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FLTR or FNDF?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FLTR and FNDF are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FLTR or FNDF?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FLTR and FNDF both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FLTR vs FNDF comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

FLTR

Market cap

$2.67B

Sector

Financials

FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

Market cap

$22.96B

Sector

Financials

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	FLTR	FNDF	Winner
Warren Buffett	50C	50C	Tie
Benjamin Graham	50C	50C	Tie

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FLTR	FNDF
Market cap	$2.67B	$22.96B
P/E (TTM)	-	-
EV/EBIT	-	-
ROIC (TTM)	-	-
Gross margin	-	-
Net margin	-	-
Revenue CAGR 5y	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FLTR leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

FNDF leads on

Market cap$22.96Bvs $2.67B+88%

More like FLTR

FLTR vs MSCI FLTR vs V FLTR vs MA FLTR vs PLMR FLTR vs TW FLTR vs MKTX

More like FNDF

FNDF vs MSCI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.