Stock comparison
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
Palomar Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
Market cap
$2.67B
Sector
Financials
PLMR
Palomar Holdings
Market cap
$3.04B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Palomar Holdings PLMR
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | FLTR | PLMR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 50C | 73B | PLMR |
| Benjamin Graham | 50C | 63C | PLMR |
| Philip Fisher |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | FLTR | PLMR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.67B | $3.04B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 15.5x |
| EV/EBIT | - | 13.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | - | 11.53% |
| Gross margin | - | 60.65% |
| Net margin | - | 20.15% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | - | 37.12% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
FLTR leads on
No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.
PLMR leads on
- Market cap$3.04Bvs $2.67B+12%
More like PLMR
Related on invest-like
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.