Which is better, FN or QBTS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Fabrinet (FN) currently grades higher than QBTS — 45/100 (D grade) vs 20/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — FN wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; QBTS wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FN or QBTS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FN and QBTS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FN better than QBTS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, FN currently grades higher — 45/100 vs 20/100, a 25-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between FN and QBTS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FN currently scores 45/100 (D grade); QBTS scores 20/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FN or QBTS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FN and QBTS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FN or QBTS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FN and QBTS both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Fabrinet (FN) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FN vs QBTS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Fabrinet

D-Wave Quantum

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fabrinet

Market cap

$25.87B

Sector

Technology

QBTS

D-Wave Quantum

Market cap

$7.47B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

Fabrinet FN

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	FN	QBTS	Winner
Warren Buffett	45D	20F	FN
Benjamin Graham	78B	40D	FN
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FN	QBTS
Market cap	$25.87B	$7.47B
P/E (TTM)	61.9x	-
EV/EBIT	78.7x	-
ROIC (TTM)	16.5%	-11.38%
Gross margin	11.96%	66.27%
Net margin	9.87%	-29.57%
Revenue CAGR 5y	16.14%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FN leads on

ROIC (TTM)16.5%vs -11.38%+169%
Net margin9.87%vs -29.57%+100%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.0x+81%
Market cap$25.87Bvs $7.47B

More like FN

FN vs FICO FN vs FTNT FN vs ADSK FN vs KLAC FN vs NP FN vs CDNS

More like QBTS

QBTS vs FICO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.