Which is better, FNDF or XLV?

FNDF and XLV tie on the headline Buffett-Fit score (50/100 each). The decision comes down to which underlying framework you trust most — FNDF leads on none; XLV leads on none. The pillar-by-pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FNDF or XLV?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FNDF and XLV are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FNDF better than XLV for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (50/100 vs 50/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between FNDF and XLV on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FNDF currently scores 50/100 (C grade); XLV scores 50/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FNDF or XLV?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FNDF and XLV are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FNDF or XLV?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FNDF and XLV both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FNDF vs XLV comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

FNDF

Market cap

$22.96B

Sector

Financials

XLV

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

Market cap

$37.07B

Sector

Financials

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	FNDF	XLV	Winner
Warren Buffett	50C	50C	Tie
Benjamin Graham	50C	50C	Tie

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FNDF	XLV
Market cap	$22.96B	$37.07B
P/E (TTM)	-	-
EV/EBIT	-	-
ROIC (TTM)	-	-
Gross margin	-	-
Net margin	-	-
Revenue CAGR 5y	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FNDF leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

XLV leads on

Market cap$37.07Bvs $22.96B+38%

More like FNDF

FNDF vs MSCI FNDF vs V FNDF vs MA FNDF vs PLMR FNDF vs TW FNDF vs MKTX

More like XLV

XLV vs MSCI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.