Fortinet vs IBM stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Fortinet is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. IBM is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Fortinet | IBM | |
|---|---|---|
| $93.5 billion | $234 billion | |
| 27.3% | 15.7% | |
| +21.3% | +4.1% | |
| 50.4× | 22.0× | |
| Net cash | 3.0 years | |
| 83.5% | 10.2% | |
| – | 2.5% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Fortinet vs Intel · Fortinet vs Intuit · Fortinet vs KLA · Fortinet vs Lumentum Holdings · IBM vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise · IBM vs HP · IBM vs KLA · IBM vs Lam Research

