Fortinet vs Marvell Technology stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Fortinet is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Marvell Technology is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| Fortinet | Marvell Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| $93.5 billion | $141 billion | |
| 27.3% | 32.6% | |
| +21.3% | +22.5% | |
| 50.4× | 52.8× | |
| Net cash | 0.5 years | |
| 83.5% | 13.8% | |
| – | 0.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Fortinet vs Microsoft · Fortinet vs Motorola Solutions · Fortinet vs Strategy · Fortinet vs Micron Technology · Marvell Technology vs KLA · Marvell Technology vs Lam Research · Marvell Technology vs Microsoft · Marvell Technology vs Nvidia

