Which is better, GD or IR?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) currently grades higher than GD — 47/100 (D grade) vs 47/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GD wins on Peter Lynch and Joel Greenblatt; IR wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GD or IR?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GD and IR are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GD better than IR for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (47/100 vs 47/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between GD and IR on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GD currently scores 47/100 (D grade); IR scores 47/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GD or IR?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GD and IR are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GD or IR?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GD and IR both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GD vs IR comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

General Dynamics

Ingersoll Rand

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

General Dynamics

Market cap

$90.46B

Sector

Industrials

Ingersoll Rand

Market cap

$27.53B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Ingersoll Rand IR

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	GD	IR	Winner
Warren Buffett	47D	47D	Tie
Benjamin Graham	59C	73B

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GD	IR
Market cap	$90.46B	$27.53B
P/E (TTM)	20.8x	47.0x
EV/EBIT	17.7x	18.5x
ROIC (TTM)	10.81%	6.48%
Gross margin	15.24%	38.24%
Net margin	8.07%	7.54%
Revenue CAGR 5y	8.11%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GD leads on

Dividend yield1.82%vs 0.11%+94%
EPS CAGR 5y7.73%vs 1.79%+77%
Market cap$90.46Bvs $27.53B+70%
P/E (TTM)20.8xvs 47.0x

More like GD

GD vs CTAS GD vs FAST GD vs RELX GD vs OMAB GD vs TT GD vs CSW

More like IR

IR vs CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.