The GEO Group vs Installed Building Products stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The GEO Group is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Installed Building Products grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| The GEO Group | Installed Building Products | |
|---|---|---|
| $4.28 billion | $6.42 billion | |
| 9.7% | 8.9% | |
| +2.3% | +12.4% | |
| 16.8× | 24.2× | |
| 2.6 years | 1.3 years | |
| 12.4% | 18.5% | |
| – | 1.6% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The GEO Group vs Lennar · Installed Building Products vs Lennar

