Corning vs KLA stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
KLA is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Corning | KLA | |
|---|---|---|
| $98.3 billion | $198 billion | |
| 10.2% | 35.6% | |
| +6.7% | +14.4% | |
| 61.6× | 41.1× | |
| 2.1 years | 0.7 years | |
| 9.1% | 38.2% | |
| 0.6% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Corning vs Lam Research · Corning vs Microsoft · Corning vs Nvidia · Corning vs Apple · KLA vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise · KLA vs IBM · KLA vs Intel · KLA vs Intuit

