Which is more profitable, W.W. Grainger or Vertiv?

Vertiv keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, W.W. Grainger or Vertiv?

Vertiv grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, W.W. Grainger or Vertiv?

W.W. Grainger costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, W.W. Grainger or Vertiv?

Vertiv would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

W.W. GraingerGWWvs

VertivVRT

W.W. Grainger vs Vertiv stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

W.W. Grainger is cheaper for its profits. Vertiv is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	W.W. Grainger	Vertiv
	$69.7 billion	$77.8 billion
	9.5%	13.0%
	+8.7%	+18.5%
	40.9×	58.4×
	0.8 years	0.7 years
	30.8%	20.7%
	0.7%	0.1%

Open W.W. Grainger Open Vertiv

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: W.W. Grainger vs Automatic Data Processing · W.W. Grainger vs Ametek · W.W. Grainger vs Caterpillar · W.W. Grainger vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Vertiv vs RELX · Vertiv vs SpaceX · Vertiv vs Trane Technologies · Vertiv vs Caterpillar