HSBC Holdings vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
HSBC Holdings is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. S&P Global grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| HSBC Holdings | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $306 billion | $137 billion | |
| 33.7% | 29.2% | |
| +7.2% | +15.6% | |
| 13.7× | 30.7× | |
| 6.7 years | 1.5 years | |
| 0.6% | 11.8% | |
| 4.0% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: HSBC Holdings vs Visa · HSBC Holdings vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · HSBC Holdings vs JPMorgan Chase · HSBC Holdings vs Mastercard · S&P Global vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · S&P Global vs Interactive Brokers Group · S&P Global vs Intercontinental Exchange · S&P Global vs ING Groep

