JPMorgan Chase vs National Australia Bank stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
JPMorgan Chase grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. National Australia Bank is more profitable.
Side by side
| JPMorgan Chase | National Australia Bank | |
|---|---|---|
| $919 billion | A$121 billion | |
| 31.4% | 33.7% | |
| +8.7% | +7.3% | |
| 16.1× | 17.4× | |
| 11.3 years | – | |
| 3.0% | – | |
| 2.0% | 3.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: JPMorgan Chase vs Nasdaq · JPMorgan Chase vs Nu Holdings · JPMorgan Chase vs NatWest Group · JPMorgan Chase vs The Progressive · National Australia Bank vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2

