Which is more profitable, Lam Research or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Lam Research keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Lam Research or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Lam Research grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Lam Research or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Seagate Technology Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Lam Research or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Lam Research would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Lam ResearchLRCXvs

Seagate Technology HoldingsSTX

Lam Research vs Seagate Technology Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Lam Research is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Seagate Technology Holdings is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Lam Research	Seagate Technology Holdings
	$282 billion	$121 billion
	31.3%	26.1%
	+9.7%	+2.7%
	38.8×	38.1×
	Net cash	0.4 years
	42.1%	53.4%
	0.3%	0.3%

Open Lam Research Open Seagate Technology Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Lam Research vs TE Connectivity · Lam Research vs TSMC · Lam Research vs Texas Instruments · Lam Research vs Uber · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Microsoft · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Nvidia · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Sandisk · Seagate Technology Holdings vs TSMC