Which is better, MAR or TMHC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) currently grades higher than TMHC — 53/100 (C grade) vs 49/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MAR wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; TMHC wins on Benjamin Graham. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MAR or TMHC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MAR and TMHC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MAR better than TMHC for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (53/100 vs 49/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between MAR and TMHC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MAR currently scores 53/100 (C grade); TMHC scores 49/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MAR or TMHC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MAR and TMHC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MAR or TMHC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MAR and TMHC both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MAR vs TMHC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Marriott International

Taylor Morrison Home

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

MAR

Market cap

$93.13B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

TMHC

Taylor Morrison Home

Market cap

$5.12B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Marriott International MAR

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MAR	TMHC	Winner
Warren Buffett	53C	49D	MAR
Benjamin Graham	39D	40D	TMHC
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MAR	TMHC
Market cap	$93.13B	$5.12B
P/E (TTM)	36.7x	7.8x
EV/EBIT	26.4x	6.1x
ROIC (TTM)	15.35%	10.66%
Gross margin	21.38%	22.44%
Net margin	9.72%	8.83%
Revenue CAGR 5y	17.25%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MAR leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 0.4x+110%
Dividend yield0.76%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$93.13Bvs $5.12B+95%
Revenue CAGR 5y17.25%vs 2.01%

More like MAR

MAR vs WINA MAR vs RACE MAR vs BKNG MAR vs ATAT MAR vs IHG MAR vs HLT

More like TMHC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.