Which is better, MCHP or NTES?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, NetEase, Inc. (NTES) currently grades higher than MCHP — 56/100 (C grade) vs 44/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MCHP wins on Benjamin Graham and Joel Greenblatt; NTES wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MCHP or NTES?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MCHP and NTES are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MCHP better than NTES for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, NTES currently grades higher — 56/100 vs 44/100, a 12-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between MCHP and NTES on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MCHP currently scores 44/100 (D grade); NTES scores 56/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MCHP or NTES?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MCHP and NTES are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MCHP or NTES?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MCHP and NTES both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MCHP vs NTES comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Microchip Technology

NetEase

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

MCHP

Market cap

$50.86B

Sector

Technology

NTES

NetEase

Market cap

$72.35B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

NetEase NTES

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MCHP	NTES	Winner
Warren Buffett	44D	56C	NTES
Benjamin Graham	64C	63C	MCHP
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MCHP	NTES
Market cap	$50.86B	$72.35B
P/E (TTM)	251.7x	14.7x
EV/EBIT	113.0x	12.6x
ROIC (TTM)	3.15%	17.4%
Gross margin	57.73%	64.29%
Net margin	4.29%	29.98%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-8.83%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MCHP leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

NTES leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y6.48%vs -8.83%+173%
EPS CAGR 5y20.19%vs -41.66%+148%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.9x+95%

More like MCHP

MCHP vs FICO MCHP vs FTNT MCHP vs ADSK MCHP vs KLAC MCHP vs NP MCHP vs CDNS

More like NTES

NTES vs FICO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.