Which is better, MKC or STZ?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) currently grades higher than MKC — 42/100 (D grade) vs 41/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MKC wins on Peter Lynch and Joel Greenblatt; STZ wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MKC or STZ?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MKC and STZ are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MKC better than STZ for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (41/100 vs 42/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between MKC and STZ on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MKC currently scores 41/100 (D grade); STZ scores 42/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MKC or STZ?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MKC and STZ are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MKC or STZ?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MKC and STZ both Consumer Defensive stocks?

Yes — both McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) operate in the Consumer Defensive sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MKC vs STZ comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

McCormick &

Constellation Brands

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

MKC

McCormick &

Market cap

$13.04B

Sector

Consumer Staples

STZ

Constellation Brands

Market cap

$25.79B

Sector

Consumer Staples

Overall winner

Constellation Brands STZ

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MKC	STZ	Winner
Warren Buffett	41D	42D	STZ
Benjamin Graham	39D	44D	STZ
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MKC	STZ
Market cap	$13.04B	$25.79B
P/E (TTM)	7.9x	15.4x
EV/EBIT	16.3x	12.9x
ROIC (TTM)	6.13%	10.48%
Gross margin	37.94%	51.67%
Net margin	23.12%	18.46%
Revenue CAGR 5y	2.01%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MKC leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y2.01%vs 0.89%+56%
Debt / Equity0.7xvs 1.4x+49%
P/E (TTM)7.9xvs 15.4x+49%
Dividend yield3.84%vs 2.73%

More like MKC

MKC vs PM MKC vs MNST MKC vs MO MKC vs CL MKC vs PRDO MKC vs IPAR

More like STZ

STZ vs PM

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.