Which is better, MOG-A or OMAB?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) currently grades higher than MOG-A — 69/100 (B grade) vs 40/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MOG-A wins on Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; OMAB wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MOG-A or OMAB?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MOG-A and OMAB are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MOG-A better than OMAB for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, OMAB currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 40/100, a 29-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between MOG-A and OMAB on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MOG-A currently scores 40/100 (D grade); OMAB scores 69/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MOG-A or OMAB?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MOG-A and OMAB are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MOG-A or OMAB?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MOG-A and OMAB both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Moog Inc. (MOG-A) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MOG-A vs OMAB comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Moog

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

MOG-A

Moog

Market cap

$10.1B

Sector

Industrials

OMAB

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Market cap

$4.98B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. OMAB

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MOG-A	OMAB	Winner
Warren Buffett	40D	69B	OMAB
Benjamin Graham	70B	66B	MOG-A
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MOG-A	OMAB
Market cap	$10.1B	$4.98B
P/E (TTM)	33.8x	16.2x
EV/EBIT	24.3x	10.7x
ROIC (TTM)	9.08%	10.34%
Gross margin	26.95%	69.04%
Net margin	6.83%	32.63%
Revenue CAGR 5y	7.87%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MOG-A leads on

Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.1x+71%
Market cap$10.1Bvs $4.98B+51%

OMAB leads on

Dividend yield5.18%vs 0.39%+93%

More like MOG-A

MOG-A vs CTAS MOG-A vs FAST MOG-A vs RELX MOG-A vs TT MOG-A vs CSW MOG-A vs HEI

More like OMAB

OMAB vs CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.