Merck & vs Pfizer stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Merck & is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Merck & | Pfizer | |
|---|---|---|
| $364 billion | $165 billion | |
| 28.1% | 12.4% | |
| +9.4% | +8.5% | |
| 20.0× | 21.2× | |
| 1.2 years | 3.7 years | |
| 17.8% | 5.5% | |
| 2.8% | 6.6% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Merck & vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Merck & vs Roche · Merck & vs Sanofi · Merck & vs Stryker · Pfizer vs Roche · Pfizer vs UnitedHealth · Pfizer vs AbbVie · Pfizer vs Johnson & Johnson

