Merck & vs Thermo Fisher Scientific stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Merck & is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Merck & | Thermo Fisher Scientific | |
|---|---|---|
| $364 billion | $259 billion | |
| 28.1% | 15.0% | |
| +9.4% | +6.7% | |
| 20.0× | 38.7× | |
| 1.2 years | 2.6 years | |
| 17.8% | 7.6% | |
| 2.8% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Merck & vs UnitedHealth · Merck & vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals · Merck & vs AbbVie · Merck & vs Amgen · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Roche · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Rockwell Automation · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Stryker

