Which is more profitable, Motorola Solutions or Palo Alto Networks?

Motorola Solutions keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Motorola Solutions or Palo Alto Networks?

Palo Alto Networks grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Motorola Solutions or Palo Alto Networks?

Motorola Solutions costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Motorola Solutions or Palo Alto Networks?

Palo Alto Networks would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Motorola SolutionsMSIvs

Palo Alto NetworksPANW

Motorola Solutions vs Palo Alto Networks stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Motorola Solutions is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Palo Alto Networks grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Motorola Solutions	Palo Alto Networks
	$87.8 billion	$264 billion
	18.4%	12.3%
	+9.5%	+22.0%
	40.8×	232.7×
	2.4 years	Net cash
	21.1%	15.9%
	1.2%	–

Open Motorola Solutions Open Palo Alto Networks

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Motorola Solutions vs Qualcomm · Motorola Solutions vs TSMC · Motorola Solutions vs Ubiquiti · Motorola Solutions vs Apple · Palo Alto Networks vs Micron Technology · Palo Alto Networks vs ServiceNow · Palo Alto Networks vs Nvidia · Palo Alto Networks vs Oracle