Nu Holdings vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Nu Holdings grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. S&P Global is more profitable and has less debt.
Side by side
| Nu Holdings | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $64.0 billion | $137 billion | |
| 27.0% | 29.2% | |
| +52.9% | +15.6% | |
| 22.3× | 30.7× | |
| 7.2 years | 1.5 years | |
| 4.1% | 11.8% | |
| – | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Nu Holdings vs Visa · Nu Holdings vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Nu Holdings vs JPMorgan Chase · Nu Holdings vs Mastercard · S&P Global vs NatWest Group · S&P Global vs The Progressive · S&P Global vs The PNC Financial Services Group · S&P Global vs Royal Bank of Canada

