Procter & Gamble vs Unilever stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Procter & Gamble grows faster and has less debt. Unilever is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Procter & Gamble | Unilever | |
|---|---|---|
| $394 billion | $143 billion | |
| 18.4% | 18.7% | |
| +2.7% | −5.6% | |
| 24.5× | 13.7× | |
| 1.0 years | 2.1 years | |
| 19.3% | 18.4% | |
| 2.9% | 3.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Procter & Gamble vs Walmart · Procter & Gamble vs Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV · Procter & Gamble vs Church & Dwight · Procter & Gamble vs Colgate-Palmolive · Unilever vs Philip Morris International · Unilever vs Target · Unilever vs Walmart · Unilever vs British American Tobacco p.l.c.

