Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Trimble stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Thermo Fisher Scientific is more profitable and grows faster. Trimble is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | Trimble | |
|---|---|---|
| $259 billion | $12.8 billion | |
| 15.0% | 11.8% | |
| +6.7% | +2.6% | |
| 38.7× | 30.1× | |
| 2.6 years | 1.4 years | |
| 7.6% | 7.1% | |
| 0.4% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Thermo Fisher Scientific vs AbbVie · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Amgen · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Bristol-Myers Squibb · Thermo Fisher Scientific vs Intuitive Surgical · Trimble vs Rockwell Automation

