Which is better, IPAR or UL?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) currently grades higher than UL — 73/100 (B grade) vs 67/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — IPAR wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, and Terry Smith; UL wins on Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy IPAR or UL?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both IPAR and UL are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is IPAR better than UL for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, IPAR currently grades higher — 73/100 vs 67/100, a 6-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between IPAR and UL on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). IPAR currently scores 73/100 (B grade); UL scores 67/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, IPAR or UL?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. IPAR and UL are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, IPAR or UL?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are IPAR and UL both Consumer Defensive stocks?

Yes — both Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) and Unilever PLC (UL) operate in the Consumer Defensive sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this IPAR vs UL comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Inter Parfums

Unilever

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

IPAR

Inter Parfums

Market cap

$2.86B

Sector

Consumer Staples

Unilever

Market cap

$124.69B

Sector

Consumer Staples

Overall winner

Inter Parfums IPAR

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	IPAR	UL	Winner
Warren Buffett	73B	67B	IPAR
Benjamin Graham	75B	76B	UL
Philip Fisher	65B	56D	IPAR
Peter Lynch	49D	62C	UL
Joel Greenblatt	37D	37D	Tie
Charlie Munger	60C	65C	UL
Terry Smith	63C	53C	IPAR

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	IPAR	UL
Market cap	$2.86B	$124.69B
P/E (TTM)	16.5x	24.3x
EV/EBIT	10.7x	12.9x
ROIC (TTM)	15.92%	15.1%
Gross margin	63.96%	66.95%
Net margin	11.33%	12.25%
Revenue CAGR 5y	14.06%	-0.94%
EPS CAGR 5y	17.44%	3.56%
Debt / Equity	0.2x	1.9x
Dividend yield	3.66%	4.02%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

IPAR leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y14.06%vs -0.94%+107%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 1.9x+89%
EPS CAGR 5y17.44%vs 3.56%+80%
P/E (TTM)16.5xvs 24.3x+32%

UL leads on

Market cap$124.69Bvs $2.86B+98%
Dividend yield4.02%vs 3.66%+9%
Net margin12.25%vs 11.33%+8%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Inter Parfums

Unilever

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like IPAR

More like UL

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis