Best stock screeners for value investors in 2026
A comparison of 10 stock screeners used by value investors in 2026. Methodology disclosed, public pricing verified, weaknesses called out per tool. Each entry includes a "best for" line so you can pick the right one for your actual use case.
Last reviewed: · Hosted by invest-like.com (disclosed)
invest-like is the only tool here that publishes its verdict accuracy. The 7-framework consensus screen is +73.8% vs the S&P 500 over five years, every pick logged in public, with the entry timestamps locked.
See the published track recordThis article is hosted by invest-like.com. invest-like is ranked first because it is the only screener in the cohort that fuses seven named-investor frameworks into a single consensus grade and pairs that with an AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen. The ranking is opinionated, not statistical. Each tool genuinely competes on a different axis, and the right pick depends on your specific use case.
Each entry includes (1) what the tool does, (2) where it wins, (3) where it falls short, (4) who should pick it. Public pricing was verified on May 26, 2026 by visiting each vendor's pricing page. Educational only, never financial advice.
invest-like
Killer feature: 7-framework consensus on every stock plus AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen
An AI-first value-investing screener that grades every stock in a global 21,000+ universe (68 countries, 35 exchanges, roughly half listed outside the US) from 0 to 100 against seven documented investor frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, T. Smith). The screener blends all seven grades into a single consensus score so a value investor can filter for stocks that hold up across multiple lenses at once instead of running seven separate screens. Halal Mode adds an integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 screen on every ticker, and the Boardroom feature lets Buffett, Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt debate any shortlist candidate live with a skeptic and inline citations.
Where it wins
- Only screener that fuses 7 named-investor frameworks into one consensus grade
- Published 5-year backtest with locked entry timestamps on the public track record
- Free tier exposes the Buffett-Fit Score on every ticker
- Integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen at no extra cost
- Plain-English reasoning shown alongside every framework grade
Where it falls short
- Smaller universe than TIKR or Stockopedia (21,000+ stocks vs their 100,000+ for raw-data breadth)
- Fewer micro-cap and OTC names than the largest data-only archives
- Solo-founder operation, younger than incumbents
- No DCF modeller (intentional, the screen relies on framework signals)
Best for
Value investors who want one consensus grade across the major frameworks instead of running seven separate screens, plus optional halal filtering.
Finviz
Killer feature: Heatmap-driven free screener with 70+ fundamental and technical filters
Long the default free screener for US equities. Finviz exposes more than seventy filters (P/E, P/B, dividend yield, debt/equity, ROE, insider ownership, etc.) and pairs them with a live S&P 500 heatmap, sector rotation views, and a fast charting layer. The free tier is unusually generous for the category, which is why most beginner value-investing tutorials still start with Finviz.
Where it wins
- Most generous free tier of any US equity screener
- Fast filter UI, very low learning curve
- Heatmap, sector views, and short-interest data baked in
- Custom screen presets cover most classic value templates
Where it falls short
- US listings only on the free tier
- No multi-investor framework or composite quality score
- Real-time data and exports gated behind Elite (39.50 USD/mo)
- Ads on the free tier and a dated UI
Best for
Value investors who want a free, fast, filter-driven screener and are comfortable building their own value template from scratch.
Stockopedia
Killer feature: StockRanks combining Quality, Value, and Momentum into a 0-100 score
A UK-based platform built around the StockRanks system, which blends Quality, Value, and Momentum into a single 0-100 score for every covered stock. Heavily inspired by O Shaughnessy and Piotroski research, Stockopedia is especially strong on UK, European, and Asian listings where US-centric tools like Finviz fall short. Includes a robust screener, pre-built guru screens (Greenblatt, Graham, Buffett-style), and a portfolio tracker.
Where it wins
- Single composite StockRank across Quality, Value, and Momentum
- Excellent coverage of UK, European, and Asian listings
- Dozens of pre-built guru-style screens out of the box
- Strong educational content and an active member community
Where it falls short
- No free tier beyond a limited trial
- Methodology is proprietary, not derived from named-investor frameworks
- No AI verdict or chat layer
- No halal screening
Best for
Value investors focused on UK and European markets who want a composite Quality/Value/Momentum score and a deep library of pre-built guru screens.
Stock Rover
Killer feature: 650+ metrics per ticker with deep portfolio and watchlist analytics
A long-running deep-fundamentals platform aimed at advanced retail value investors. Stock Rover indexes 650+ metrics per ticker on US and Canadian listings, ships a custom screener with rich back-testing, and pairs it with portfolio analytics that connect to most major US brokerages. The interface is dense and spreadsheet-like, which is exactly what its core audience wants.
Where it wins
- 650+ metrics per ticker (one of the deepest in retail)
- Strong custom screener with full back-testing
- Portfolio import from most major US brokerages
- Reasonable annualised pricing for the depth on offer
Where it falls short
- US and Canada only
- Steep learning curve, UI is dense and not beginner-friendly
- No AI verdict or composite framework score
- No halal screening
Best for
Advanced US-focused value investors who want maximum metric depth, custom screening, and integrated portfolio analytics in a single tool.
GuruFocus
Killer feature: 13F-driven screens that mirror what famous value investors actually own
The original platform for tracking what famous value investors (the gurus) actually hold in their portfolios. GuruFocus pulls 13F filings into a clean UI showing what Buffett, Klarman, Pabrai, and dozens of others own, then layers screeners on top so users can filter for stocks owned by multiple gurus, recent guru buys, or guru consensus. Pioneered the category and remains the most cited source for 13F-derived screening.
Where it wins
- Excellent guru-holdings tracking via 13F data
- Long historical archive of guru portfolios
- Pre-built value screens (Graham Number, Magic Formula, undervalued predictable)
- Coverage extends to US and selected international gurus
Where it falls short
- Higher pricing than most retail screeners (49-499 USD/mo)
- UI feels dated compared to newer entrants
- Cancellation flow has been a recurring user complaint
- AI features are recent additions, not core
Best for
Value investors who specifically want to mirror named investor holdings via 13F data and have budget for an institutional-style screener.
TIKR Terminal
Killer feature: Bloomberg-tier 20-year financials with screening across 100,000+ tickers
The heavyweight in retail fundamentals data. TIKR provides 20-year historical financials, deep custom screening across more than 100,000 global tickers, DCF modelling, Excel export, and pro-grade charting. Built for advanced retail users who want what Bloomberg charges five-figure prices for at a sub-30 USD/month price point. The screener supports complex multi-condition value templates.
Where it wins
- Largest historical financials archive in retail (20+ years)
- 100,000+ global ticker coverage including emerging markets
- Industry-leading multi-condition screener and DCF modeller
- Excel export for custom value-investing workflows
Where it falls short
- Steepest learning curve in the category
- No composite quality score or framework consensus
- Free tier is meaningfully limited (most features paywalled)
- No halal screening
Best for
Advanced retail value investors who want full data control across global markets and are willing to build their own screening templates.
Simply Wall St
Killer feature: Snowflake chart plus a polished mobile-first screener
The famous Snowflake visualisation tool: a five-axis radar chart scoring each stock on Value, Future, Past, Health, and Dividends. Layered on top is a screener with pre-built filters for undervalued stocks, dividend payers, and high-quality compounders. Strong mobile app and broad international coverage make it the most beginner-friendly entry on this list.
Where it wins
- Best UX in the category (the Snowflake chart is iconic)
- Mature mobile app with full screening on small screens
- Coverage across multiple international exchanges
- Portfolio import and tracking integrated
Where it falls short
- Five-axis scoring is proprietary, not tied to named investor frameworks
- No multi-framework consensus
- No AI debate or chat features
- No halal screening
Best for
Beginning value investors who want a visual gut-check screener and a polished mobile-first experience.
Old School Value
Killer feature: Pre-built screens for Buffett, Graham, Greenblatt, and Piotroski templates
A long-running platform built explicitly around classic value-investing frameworks. Old School Value computes Graham Number, Net-Net Working Capital, intrinsic value DCFs, Piotroski F-Score, and Greenblatt Magic Formula ranks for every US-listed stock, and ships pre-built screens that operationalise each framework. Best suited for investors who already know which framework they want to run and want the math computed for them.
Where it wins
- Pre-built Buffett, Graham, Greenblatt, and Piotroski screens out of the box
- Intrinsic value DCF computed per ticker
- Strong educational content tied to the screening templates
- Reasonable pricing for the depth of pre-built screens
Where it falls short
- US listings only
- UI feels dated relative to newer entrants
- No AI verdict, no chat, no live debate
- No halal screening
Best for
Value investors who already know which classic framework they trust and want the calculations pre-built rather than rolling their own.
Magic Formula Investing
Killer feature: Joel Greenblatt's official Magic Formula screen, run for free
The official free screener for Joel Greenblatt's Magic Formula strategy, run by Greenblatt himself (joelgreenblatt.com). The screener ranks US-listed stocks by Earnings Yield and Return on Capital, then returns the top 30 or 50 names above a chosen market-cap threshold. No tools, no fundamentals platform, no AI layer. One strategy, one screen, free.
Where it wins
- Completely free, no signup needed beyond a basic account
- Run by Greenblatt himself, the canonical Magic Formula source
- Simple, focused output (30 or 50 ranked names)
- Useful as a sanity check against any paid Magic Formula screener
Where it falls short
- Single strategy only (no other frameworks)
- No portfolio tracking, no charting, no exports
- No methodology customisation beyond market-cap floor
- US listings only
Best for
Value investors who specifically want to run the canonical Greenblatt Magic Formula screen at zero cost.
Yahoo Finance Premium
Killer feature: Argus and Morningstar fair-value estimates inside a familiar Yahoo UI
Yahoo Finance Premium layers Argus equity research, Morningstar fair-value estimates, and an expanded screener on top of the familiar free Yahoo Finance portal. The screener supports value-style filters (P/E, P/B, fair-value discount, dividend yield) and the fair-value column lets users quickly sort the universe by Morningstar's undervalued/overvalued bucket. Best treated as a polished mainstream complement to a dedicated value screener, not a replacement.
Where it wins
- Morningstar fair-value estimates integrated into the screener
- Argus equity research included on covered names
- Familiar Yahoo Finance UI, near-zero learning curve
- Broad international ticker coverage
Where it falls short
- Filter set is shallower than dedicated value screeners
- No multi-framework consensus or composite quality score
- No backtesting on screen results
- Ads remain visible even on the paid tier
Best for
Casual value investors who already live inside Yahoo Finance and want fair-value estimates plus a basic screener bundled together.
Frequently asked questions
How were these stock screeners ranked?
By fit for the 'value investor stock screener' use case as of May 2026: how well each platform helps a retail value investor filter the universe down to candidates that hold up on quality, valuation, and balance-sheet strength. The ranking is opinionated, not the result of a statistical model. Each tool competes on a different axis (composite scoring, raw data depth, single-strategy screening, guru mirroring, free utility), and the 'best for' line under each entry tells you which user it is aimed at.
Is invest-like ranking itself first a conflict of interest?
Yes, and it is disclosed at the top of the page and again here. invest-like.com hosts this article. It is ranked first because it is the only screener in the cohort that fuses seven named-investor frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, T. Smith) into a single consensus grade and combines that with an AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen. If your specific need is different (Greenblatt-only, deep raw data, UK coverage), the right pick is whichever entry below matches that. Read the 'best for' line under each.
What is the cheapest serious stock screener for value investors?
Finviz (free tier) and the official Magic Formula screener at joelgreenblatt.com (also free) are the two strongest zero-cost options. Beyond free, Stock Rover's entry tier (7.99 USD/mo on annual) and invest-like's 15 EUR/mo plan are the most cost-efficient paid options that still expose serious screening. Anything below 7-15 USD/mo in this category is typically either heavily limited or ad-supported.
Which screener is best for non-US value investors?
Stockopedia (UK, EU, Asia) and TIKR Terminal (100,000+ global tickers) have the deepest non-US coverage on this list. Simply Wall St also covers multiple international exchanges with a more beginner-friendly UI. invest-like is also global, scoring 21,000+ stocks across 68 countries and 35 exchanges (LSE, XETRA, Euronext, Tokyo, Hong Kong, NSE/BSE India, Taiwan, Korea, ASX, SIX Swiss, B3 Sao Paulo and more) with roughly half the universe outside the US. Old School Value and the official Magic Formula screener remain US-only as of May 2026.
Which screener is best for halal investors?
invest-like is the only screener on this list with an integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen on every ticker. None of the other nine tools include halal screening as a first-class feature. Halal investors typically pair invest-like with a manual Zoya or Musaffa cross-check before buying.
Do these screeners include backtesting?
Partially. Stock Rover, Stockopedia, and TIKR Terminal include full backtesting on screen results. Old School Value supports limited backtesting on the pre-built framework screens. invest-like publishes a single live 5-year backtest of its overall value strategy on the public track record, but does not let users back-test arbitrary custom screens yet. Finviz, the official Magic Formula screener, Simply Wall St, GuruFocus, and Yahoo Finance Premium do not include screener backtesting as a first-class feature.
Why is Bloomberg not on this list?
Bloomberg Terminal is an institutional tool priced at roughly 24,000 USD per year per seat. The screeners on this list are aimed at retail value investors, where TIKR Terminal and Stock Rover serve as the practical retail-priced equivalents.
How often is this list updated?
Reviewed quarterly. Last reviewed May 26, 2026. Pricing, features, and rankings change frequently in this category, please verify on each tool's website before subscribing.
Free weekly email
Get the week's strongest stocks on Monday.
Every Monday: the stocks most of the seven investors newly agree on. One email, unsubscribe any time.
Research, not investment advice.
Educational only. Nothing on this page constitutes investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Public pricing and feature data verified May 26, 2026 by visiting each vendor's public website. Verify before subscribing, prices change. Investment outcomes depend on many factors; past performance does not guarantee future results.